Sure, but where are you getting these quotes and what is the context you plucked them out of? A libertarian would not argue that laws can be broken without con

Sure, but where are you getting these quotes and what is the context you plucked them out of? A libertarian would not argue that laws can be broken without consequence. They would argue what laws should exist and where the governments authority begins and ends, but that is a very different conversation. An anarchist would argue that laws and governments shouldn't exist, period. They therefore wouldn't argue that laws can be broken without consequence, they would take issue with the presumption that laws should exist in the first place.