It's not about correlation or proving anything. It's that something doing what you ascertained it never could changes what claims are and aren't extraordinary.

It's not about correlation or proving anything. It's that something doing what you ascertained it never could changes what claims are and aren't extraordinary. You can handwave it away, i.e "the thing is moving objects by magic instead" but it's there and you can't keep acting like "this thing can produce forces" is still the extraordinary claim.