> When you say things like this, you presuppose a world where we could take all the money, put it in a pile, then share it equally. This argument could be made

> When you say things like this, you presuppose a world where we could take all the money, put it in a pile, then share it equally. This argument could be made regardless of the numbers. 0.1% of the nations richest individuals control 42 percent of the nations wealth? One person controls 42 percent of the nations wealth? Surely at some point enough is enough?