> I agree with the premise that that comparison between Tiffany's and piracy doesn't hold The Tiffany’s example is naive. 1. Tiffany in that case equivalent

> I agree with the premise that that comparison between Tiffany's and piracy doesn't hold The Tiffany’s example is naive. 1. Tiffany in that case equivalent to a reseller that get stolen activation codes. 2. Pirating is more like stealing something that has infinite stock. But once pirated there’s also similar product (with infinite stock) at 0$ so the value of the product could end up being lower due and result decrease in sales. I’m all in gain-gain but the example in his post is also incomplete.