2 ms·
> Not worth reading. I would appreciate a version of this paper that is worth reading, FWIW. The paper asks an important question: shame it doesn't answer it.
by quotemstr 2y ago
> Not worth reading.
I would appreciate a version of this paper that is worth reading, FWIW. The paper asks an important question: shame it doesn't answer it.
- standfest 2y agoi am currently working on a paper in this field, focusing on the capitalisation of expertise (analogue to marx) in the dynamics of cultural industry (adorno, horkheimer). it integrates the theories of piketty and luhmann. it is rather theoretical, with a focus on the european theories (instead of adorno you could theoretically also reference chomsky). is this something you would be interested in? i can share the link of course
- itsafarqueue 2y agoYes please
- thrance 2y agoBe careful, barely mentioning Marx, Chomsky or Picketty is a thoughtcrime in the new US. Many will shut themselves down to not have to engage with what you are saying.