3 ms·
It was an offline multi-sig wallet. Hackers seem to have musked the transaction when the owners signed it as it looked good to them.
by redrove 2y ago
It was an offline multi-sig wallet. Hackers seem to have musked the transaction when the owners signed it as it looked good to them.
- cypherpunks01 2y agoWow it must have been really musked then, huh?
- redrove 2y agoA “musked” transaction consists of payload obfuscation and spoofing, more often than not malicious actors create a genuine looking UI with legit transaction details, while being malicious underneath. It’s basically phishing at a transaction signing level. I only found the term a few weeks ago and thought I was the one left out, sorry for not defining it earlier. It’s got an eerie ring to it though, right?