2 ms·
and that's awfully rude of you, but if you were concerned about message retention you wouldn't do that. so what's your point?
by ruined 2y ago
and that's awfully rude of you, but if you were concerned about message retention you wouldn't do that. so what's your point?
- spopejoy 2y agoNothing rude about it -- if the protocol depends on client-side s/w to pinky-swear it respects message retention, then it's an insecure protocol. I like signal and use it, but I already thought message retention was pointless. It seems at best a trusted informal protocol you can use with known parties but not something you can really rely on.