4 ms·
No. They are in pockets. The only reason they push(ed) progressive human rights agenda was that it allowed them to differentiate without angering their donors.
by mordae 2y ago
No. They are in pockets. The only reason they push(ed) progressive human rights agenda was that it allowed them to differentiate without angering their donors.
Hey, still mostly white guys in tech? Well at least you've renamed master to main, that settles it, right? Right?
- SlightlyLeftPad 2y agoBoth of these can be true. They’re not mutually exclusive.
- mordae 2y agoSure. Some of the powerless people in that party truly do believe in human rights and Herbert Marcuse ("words can hurt") and try to make things better. Apparently they are not the ones calling the shots. And yeah, there probably are "human rights lifestyle" people too. Again, powerless. But mostly extroverted and vocal.