10 ms·
Isn't next.js a full stack framework though? Like can't you have it do server side rendering? https://nextjs.org/docs/app/building-your-application/data-fetchin
by krashidov 2y ago
Isn't next.js a full stack framework though? Like can't you have it do server side rendering? https://nextjs.org/docs/app/building-your-application/data-fetching/server-actions-and-mutations https://nextjs.org/docs/app/building-your-application/data-f...
- matijash 2y agoFull-stack is an overloaded term, but it used to mean "a completr solution for building a web app." From the comment above: Next.js is the opposite of a "batteries included" framework. No abstractions for ORM, background jobs, sending emails, managing attachments, web socket communication - all very basic stuff when dealing with a production application.
- hombre_fatal 2y agoNext.js solves the hard thing of server rendering + frontend hydration of JS components. So if that's the battery that you need, pretty much nothing else has it except for Next.js. These days, I tend to want a web framework to do the hard things for me rather than the tedious/boilerplate but simple things like email-sending.
- krashidov 2y agoRight so if you built your own sync engine why would you use next.js?
- hombre_fatal 2y agoWell, if you went so far as to reimplement Next.js, I don't think you're using Rails either. And frankly I'd like to see it since that's a really hard problem to just roll your own solution. And probably a huge waste of time if you're trying to ship a real product on top of it.