5 ms·
I’m not sure what is the point of this comment. GP says “I don’t like it because X, Y and Z” and you come to say “Well it is X, Y, and Z so of course you don’t
by LPisGood 2y ago
I’m not sure what is the point of this comment.
GP says “I don’t like it because X, Y and Z” and you come to say “Well it is X, Y, and Z so of course you don’t like it”
- paulcole 2y agoThat’s not what they said. They said they would’ve liked it if it had X, Y, Z. That’s like me saying I would like the Sun if it rose in the west and was lime green. I’m never going to like the Sun! There is no chance of it.
- ok_dad 2y agoThat’s a dumb argument, this is a headset that they could have done anything with including adding OpenXR VR support, not a random nonsensical idea you had about a star that is not like our own.
- paulcole 2y agoNo, it’s not a dumb argument. “They” are Apple. About 40 years of history tells us that whatever dork-dream of openness isn’t happening on products Apple releases.
- ok_dad 2y agoOpenXR is basically the standard for VR these days, not some "dork dream of openness". Also, I don't get why you're being a hater, there is no point to your comments other than to shit all over my initial comment for zero reason. Did I accidentally do something to you like shit in your cereal?
- paulcole 2y agoJust because I think you’re making a bad point doesn’t make me a hater. You’re saying, “I would have liked this Apple device if it embraced an open industry standard.” Did you really believe that this is something Apple would do, based on all available evidence?
- ok_dad 2y agoI don’t fucking know if they would, leave me the fuck alone.