4 ms·
Agree. What Rails actually lacks is thousands of ready-made boilerplates that everyone and their grandma can use to spin a chat interface. Any programmer worth
by pmdr 2y ago
Agree. What Rails actually lacks is thousands of ready-made boilerplates that everyone and their grandma can use to spin a chat interface. Any programmer worth his salt should be able to write his own.
- infamouscow 2y agoThe real problem is programmers that understand how a computer works end-to-end is becoming increasingly rare, and possibly accelerated by the adoption of LLMs. A lot of them prefer to write Ruby because it is simply the most beautiful language they know of. Technical details are merely a formality expressed in code that borders art. I was under the impression the industry was collectively moving in that direction, but then bootcamps ushered in a new era of midwit frontend developers hell bent on reinventing the wheel from scratch (poorly).
- Capricorn2481 2y agoThis makes it sound like new devs entering the work force are learning Ruby, which doesn't really make sense. I mean, look at the article title. Ruby's audience seem to be people that have been using it for 8+ years. The commenter you're replying to, in fact, is saying lack of fundamentals is the reason people AREN'T using Ruby