3 ms·
It's also easy to dunk on someone without watching their content. You should probably watch the video if you want to dunk on it. It does not dunk on his physics
by furyofantares 2y ago
It's also easy to dunk on someone without watching their content. You should probably watch the video if you want to dunk on it. It does not dunk on his physics. It's extremely thoroughly researched and it's about "the sham legacy of Richard Feynman" which is specifically about the legacy of anecdotes about his personality, and is different from the actual physics legacy of Richard Feynman, and it is extremely clear on this point.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- vonneumannstan 2y agoI watched the video months ago and found it pandering and boring.
- sympil 2y agoWas it accurate or not? Who cares if the presentstion was to your liking? The question is whether or not its claims are accurate. You sound like the Feynman Bros she talks about.
- furyofantares 2y agoFrankly, I am extremely confident that you only watched a little bit of it.
- Xelynega 2y agoPandering to whom?