> "My points were made to hopefully paint a "rebuttal" image that scientists may come to conclusions different than a prevailing crusade" Absolutely; we don't

> "My points were made to hopefully paint a "rebuttal" image that scientists may come to conclusions different than a prevailing crusade" Absolutely; we don't disagree on that point. I was just taking the opportunity to illuminate a common misconception. (That we're still talking about whether it's-inherently-unsafe or not.)