4 ms·

Love Yocto! It has a learning curve but it took about a week from nothing to an embedded image including Swift and Flutter apps, U-Boot, etc. A curve worth clim

• mvip 2y ago
  Yeah it definitely isn’t straight forward. But it is complicated for good reasons given how much more complicated stuff it does behind the scenes.
• themadsens 2y ago
  I always found buildroot a lot easier to fathom and harness. And certainly flexible enough with the ability patch every included recipe and package.
  • palata 2y ago
    I think it is easier. But for some projects it becomes harder to maintain.
  • fullstop 2y ago
    I cut my teeth on Buildroot but greatly prefer Yocto now. Buildroot is fast and loose, where Yocto forces you to do the right thing.
• helpfulContrib 2y ago
  A few years ago I had to build a custom embedded image for a high-quality scientific instrument that was going into production, and I made a pass at Yocto - but ultimately decided it wasn't worth the heavy load to get everything in place to do a full build, for the specific SO-DIMM module we were using, so ended up with a custom build script to build the bootable image and all intended embedded applications. This worked out, but I've always been bothered that Yocto didn't pass my first sniff test. I ended up completing the project on time and under budget by adopting a strict "compiler on-board" approach (i.e. no cross-compiling), so that's where I got a bit dissatisfied with the Yocto approach of having a massive cross-compiling tooling method to deal with. I'll have to give it another go, but I do find that if I have to have a really beefy machine to get started on an embedded project, somethings' not quite right.