so the secretary called them "layoffs"? Alright, so they weren't fired? Thanks again. I said they weren't fired. The comment you replied to originally was about

so the secretary called them "layoffs"? Alright, so they weren't fired? Thanks again. I said they weren't fired. The comment you replied to originally was about the threat of auditing agencies is kicking up a lot of ruckus. It is fine if you think these layoffs, firings, or whatever are not necessary, even if the only reason you think that is msm reporting and a dislike of elon and donald. I don't really care. The journalists you assure me are doing just fine used 5 different words that have different meanings to convey that the people were no longer "employed". If you can get real information from that, great. I'd argue that you don't, since i've spent 3 comments arguing that.