Customary law exists for a reason. If Docker explicitly offers a service for free, then users are well within their rights to use it for free. That’s not entit

Customary law exists for a reason. If Docker explicitly offers a service for free, then users are well within their rights to use it for free. That’s not entitlement, that’s simply accepting an offer as it stands. Of course, Docker has every right to change their pricing model at any time. But until they do, users are not wrong for expecting to continue using the service as advertised. I've seen this "sense of entitlement" argument come up before, and to be clear: users expecting a company to honor its own offer isn’t entitlement, it’s just reasonable.