3 ms·
So instead of building a back door they're just completely removing the option to use E2E encryption altogether, thus making everything freely available to gove
by wackget 2y ago
So instead of building a back door they're just completely removing the option to use E2E encryption altogether, thus making everything freely available to government by default?
How is that not worse or at least equivalent to a back door?
- wonderwonder 2y agoThe UK requested the backdoor for all users, not just UK citizens.
- mholt 2y agoNo illusion of privacy.
- roughly 2y agoThey’re just pulling the feature in the UK. If they put in a back door, they’re pulling the feature for everyone.
- ziddoap 2y ago>How is that not worse or at least equivalent to a back door? It's bad for the citizens of the UK and better for everyone else on the planet with an iPhone. UK citizens should be angry with their government, not Apple.
- poisonborz 2y agoMuch better than a false sense of security. Customers know what they get, and can choose other products instead of being confused or cheated.
- incorrecthorse 2y agoIt _is_ equivalent to a back door, that's the point. The UK demand can be accessed more rapidly and properly by disabling the feature than by implementing a backdoor, since it is the same thing.
- varispeed 2y agoMany departments use iphones. I wonder how it will affect government security or government employees will be exempt?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]