4 ms·
It's a difference of intent. Paying Netflix as an individual with the intention and expectation of watching content legally is very different to torrenting tera
by a2128 2y ago
It's a difference of intent. Paying Netflix as an individual with the intention and expectation of watching content legally is very different to torrenting terabytes of pirated books on company laptops for training a commercial AI to replace those writers, and employees even expressing concern over its ethics on recorded communication
- Ajedi32 2y agoSo your position is that it is illegal for me to watch a movie on Netflix that they don't have the rights to? Just that I wouldn't be prosecuted because I didn't intend to break the law? Unless perhaps I knew they didn't have the rights to it but watched it anyway?
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 2y agoThat the judge will say you did not break the law because you reasonably believed you were following the law. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mens_rea https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mens_rea
- papercrane 2y agoCopyright infringement is a strict liability offence, so not having intent isn't a defense. However, in this scenario you'd very likely have a good "innocent infringement" defense, which would allow the judge to lower the statutory damages to as low as $200. Since the damages available are so low it wouldn't be worth suing over.