3 ms·
As I posted elsewhere: "Well, to be pedantic: S.2(2) Theft Act 1968 states that a person may be dishonest notwithstanding a willingness to pay. You could als
by linker3000 14y ago
As I posted elsewhere:
"Well, to be pedantic:
S.2(2) Theft Act 1968 states that a person may be dishonest notwithstanding a willingness to pay.
You could also fall foul of "Doing an act inconsistent with the rights of the owner"
"
So the store doesn't absolutely have to prove intent.