3 ms·
Since Trump's inauguration the new talking point on all social media is that "the EU is freeloading on the US". This is patently false. Whenever the EU starts
by tw1231656 2y ago
Since Trump's inauguration the new talking point on all social media is that "the EU is freeloading on the US".
This is patently false. Whenever the EU starts its own defense initiatives, the US interferes immediately:
https://www.euractiv.com/section/defence/news/eu-fends-off-us-attack-in-spat-over-the-blocs-military-reforms/ https://www.euractiv.com/section/defence/news/eu-fends-off-u...
For a proper European deterrence the EU would needs its own nuclear force and an independent foreign policy. Which the US would attempt to shut down very quickly.
What the US really wants is for the EU to buy US hardware with kill switches and manufacture shells for US directed proxy wars. Perhaps also supply EU soldiers in Ukraine that function as a tripwire for the continuation of Nuland's pet conflict.
The status quo is that the EU is happy with its abusive vassal relationship, pays slightly less for defense and lets the US reap benefits from a sovereign foreign policy and a dollar that is propped up by its military might.
Be careful what you ask for!
- pjc50 2y agoArticle is paywalled?
- AtlasBarfed 2y agoFrance and the UK have nuclear capability sufficient for MAD, including I believe a full nuclear triad, certainly the sea-based and land-based parts. To reiterate, the EU is the largest GDP bloc and a half a billion people, and they have theater dominance over Africa and the Middle East, and possibly Russia if Putin dies and Russia fades further. If you force a country to arm, it looks for historical and geopolitically practical ways to benefit from that armament. That is geopolitical inevitability. The EU is dismissed as too fragmented to unite, but there are two very convenient boogeymen to unite the EU: Putin, an authoritarian ghoul of naked aggression with vast historical echoes in European history, and the openly nazi saluting US, with its own historical echoes and the simmering resentment of soft dominance.