3 ms·

> Can't believe the sense of entitlement in this thread. I guess people think bandwidth grows on trees. bandwidth is super cheap if you dont use any fancy publ

• ahofmann 2y ago
  Which is very unlikely for a big service like docker. I haven't looked in this case, though.
  • coder543 2y ago
    The bigger the service, the more financial incentive they have to be smart and not pay absurd prices for things, since they can give themselves higher profit margins by controlling their costs.
• Ekaros 2y ago
  Bandwidth is cheap per unit. But if you have huge amount of those cheap units they can add up to real cost.
• linsomniac 2y ago
  How much bandwidth do you suppose DockerHub uses? I can't see it being any less than 10gigabit, probably more like 100gigabit. Just the cost of that transit is likely in the $600-6,000/mo range. Then you need to factor in the additional costs for storage and compute to serve it, switching gear, and management and maintenance. That's probably at least as much as transit. They aren't likely able to go for peering arrangements ("free" bandwidth) because their traffic is likely very asymmetric, and that doesn't save the management/storage/compute costs. I don't know what Docker's financials are, but I can imagine, as a business owner myself, situations where it was lean enough that that sort of cost could mean the difference between running the service and not.