2 ms·
Interesting. I guess this is what is referenced here: http://www.zdnet.com/samsung-sacrificed-qualcomm-truce-for-apple-war-7000001348/ http://www.zdnet.com/sams
by clhodapp 14y ago
Interesting.
I guess this is what is referenced here: http://www.zdnet.com/samsung-sacrificed-qualcomm-truce-for-apple-war-7000001348/ http://www.zdnet.com/samsung-sacrificed-qualcomm-truce-for-a...
According to the article it was not a license agreement, but rather a contract not to sue. Apparently, Samsung claims that the agreement was terminated when Apple sued them, but I would not be surprised if we see Qualcomm doing something to make clear to Samsung that it does not appreciate this move.
- gnaffle 14y agoOK, that puts it in a different perspective - the question at hand now is whether those patents are covered by the ETSI FRAND agreements, and if those agreements are relevant in Australia.