5 ms·
Regular government employees only have access to the systems they need to do their job, so they are, in fact, different.
by anonymous_user9 2y ago
Regular government employees only have access to the systems they need to do their job, so they are, in fact, different.
- Amezarak 2y agoYou don’t think anyone else has root?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- nick__m 2y agoSome system protect against that. The philosophy behind IBM RACF is :《 A key security principle is the separation of duties between different users so that no one person has sufficient access privilege to perpetrate damaging fraud.》
- JadeNB 2y ago> The philosophy behind IBM RACF is :《 A key security principle is the separation of duties between different users so that no one person has sufficient access privilege to perpetrate damaging fraud.》 I am so primed to parse emoticons eagerly that I thought that the philosophy was :《
- brendoelfrendo 2y agoI'm gonna go out on a limb and say no, not without first going through a change management process and going through a privileged session management system, except in the case of an emergency break-glass scenario where using those emergency creds throws all kinds of big DANGER alerts across the org if the access was unexpected. I can't speak to the Treasury and IRS specifically, but that's kinda standard across large orgs, especially ones that get audited regularly on their handling of sensitive data.
- scarab92 2y ago[flagged]