3 ms·
I sent this out to my colleagues two years ago and they took it as an insult. The real problem is that meetings are an inefficient form of communication. I onc
by mattmcknight 18y ago
I sent this out to my colleagues two years ago and they took it as an insult. The real problem is that meetings are an inefficient form of communication. I once had to sit through a weekly around the room status meeting where everyone tried to shine in front of the boss and brag about what they had been doing- for two hours! That's 5% of my supposed 40 hours per week being subjected to others bloviating about their accomplishments. I used to beg for timeboxing on certain people, but it was never enforced. I started dialing into the meeting on my cellphone from my desk so I could at least work. We even tried to make the meeting into a daily update blog or something, but the idiot manager liked to gather all of his subjects into the room and hold court once a week.
I like the board meetings I run. We talk about an issue for a designated period of time, and then we vote on it. Closed. Meetings without a clearly defined decision process tend not to make any decisions.
- brl 18y agoThat's nothing. At my last job we used to have weekly 'status' meetings that always turned into 3-4 hour fantasy brainstorming sessions about all the fantastic features we could someday add to our product. Since I have pretty low tolerance for unpleasant activities that are a complete waste of time I would usually lose my fucking mind near hour 2 and then storm out of the meeting to go back to work. At least at your job people really accomplished things worth bragging about rather than just sitting around and talking endlessly about all the great things they could imagine themselves accomplishing.