4 ms·
And as you see in the responses here, most people miss the point, elect to patch over the aspects in which the lack of intelligence is glaring, and eventually t
by karparov 2y ago
And as you see in the responses here, most people miss the point, elect to patch over the aspects in which the lack of intelligence is glaring, and eventually the end product will be so hard to distinguish from actual intelligence that it's deemed "good enough".
Is that bad? Idk. If you hoped that real AGI would eventually solve humanities biggest problems and questions, perhaps so. But if you want something that really really looks like AGI except to some nerds who still say "well actually", then it's gonna be good enough for most. And certainly sufficient for ending up the dystopia from that movie clip in the end.
- lern_too_spel 2y agoIf you don't give a human a calculator, they do the calculation in their head. The same with an LLM. If you give a human a calculator, they will use it. The same with an LLM. Both will say a calculator can do arithmetic better. I don't believe current LLMs are AGIs but this article's argument is a poor one.