2 ms·
In my understanding, one reason Sabine gets readily attacked (as user `cardanome` does here) is because of her criticism of orthodox physics theories. She has f
by srid 2y ago
In my understanding, one reason Sabine gets readily attacked (as user `cardanome` does here) is because of her criticism of orthodox physics theories. She has famously exclaimed that all cosmological theories supposing a “beginning” of the universe are essentially “a creation myth written in the language of mathematics”.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32618719 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32618719
- jiggawatts 2y agoRead the linked blog post by Sabine again. That’s not what she says at all. She’s saying something much more specific about the earliest moments (milliseconds!!) of the history of the universe, and before that time, of which we have practically zero observational data, and can’t ever visit even in principle. She’s arguing against woo, against science fiction, against unsupported what-if musings that are fun to talk about — but are not science.