3 ms·
The agreement was that we would not put rockets in their back yard. The response was therefore entirely predictable which means we should now consider if it was
by 6510 2y ago
The agreement was that we would not put rockets in their back yard. The response was therefore entirely predictable which means we should now consider if it was worth putting rockets in their back yard. What was gained by it?
Weakening Europe was of course good for the US economy. Blowing up our gas pipe was also good for the US economy.
But if you want to follow the official narrative: How democratic is Ukraine now that everyone is dead and the elections have been cancelled a year ago?
- mopsi 2y agoWhich rockets and where?
- rayiner 2y agoNATO’s rockets. The U.S. would never stand for Mexico to join the Soviet Union. Of course it’s completely insane to expect Russia to stand for Ukraine joining NATO.
- munksbeer 2y agoNATO already bordered Russia. There were already NATO rockets in their back yard. You're falling for Russian propaganda. This is the usual Russian land grab. They've done it many times before and they will continue to do it.
- rayiner 2y agoNo, you’re repeating neocon propaganda. Everybody outside the U.S. and Europe thinks the U.S. push to expand NATO to Russia’s border was insane.
- munksbeer 2y ago> No, you’re repeating neocon propaganda. This is bizarre. I'm not repeating any propaganda, I just went and looked at a map. You can do the same.
- mopsi 2y agoWhich ones and where? Type and location, please. The truth is that NATO has not put any rockets in Eastern Europe, and has dismantled many of those that were in Western Europe.