>Strict reading of the Constitution, nothing. Our government was not set up to be efficient, more the opposite. Thankfully, 200 years of judicial interpretatio

>Strict reading of the Constitution, nothing. Our government was not set up to be efficient, more the opposite. Thankfully, 200 years of judicial interpretation and precedent disagree with this conclusion. And of course, America's job is not to move fast and break things. it's to be as safe and stable as possible. >this is congress making rules that the executive must do something, which again is not clear they have the authority to do yup, like I said. Precedent on this has been proven wrong every time. That's exactly what the judicial branch should be doing.