35 ms·
Then they're not returning to office, and the comment doesn't apply to them.
by DidYaWipe 2y ago
Then they're not returning to office, and the comment doesn't apply to them.
- AlotOfReading 2y agoThe video you're responding, as well as every other usage of the phrase, includes these people in the definition of "return to office", so I'm not sure why you're intentionally trying to use a different, somewhat nonsensical definition.
- DidYaWipe 2y agoI'm not sure why you're intentionally trying to redefine the word "return" or miss the point. If you were never somewhere, you can't return to it. Period. Your assertion about "every other usage of the phrase" is absurd. If people were hired with the assurance that the job would always be work-from-home, then they have a legitimate gripe. They are the ONLY ones who have a legitimate gripe. That is all.
- AlotOfReading 2y agoI'm not sure if there's some English as a second language issue going on, but descriptive phrases don't have to be strictly literal. In this case, the subject is the workforce as a whole "returning", not the individual employees.
- DidYaWipe 2y agoYeah, I don't know. Maybe as your English studies continue you'll understand the literal and subtle meanings better.
- reverendsteveii 2y ago>I'm not sure why you're intentionally trying to use a different, somewhat nonsensical definition. It's just a strawman