3 ms·
Suggesting "maybe try this known inhibitor in other cell lines" isn't exactly novel information though. It'd be more impressive and useful if it hadn't had any
by rtkwe 2y ago
Suggesting "maybe try this known inhibitor in other cell lines" isn't exactly novel information though. It'd be more impressive and useful if it hadn't had any published information about working as a cancer inhibitor before. People are blasé about it because it's not really beating the allegations that it's just a very fancy parrot when the highlight of it's achievements is to say try this known inhibitor with these other cell lines, decent odds that the future work sections of papers on the drug already suggested trying on other lines too...
- baq 2y agoA couple years ago even suggesting that a computer could propose anything at all was sci-fi. Today a computer read the whole internet, suggested a place to look at and experiments to perform and… ‘not impressive enough’. Oof.
- Workaccount2 2y agoPeople are facing existential dread that the knowledge they worked years for is possibly about to become worth a $20 monthly subscription. People will downplay it for years no matter what.
- forgetfreeman 2y agoYou just described a library card.
- Der_Einzige 2y agowhoosh
- ClumsyPilot 2y ago> Today a computer read the whole internet, suggested a place to look at Or imagine this one - computer maps the whole world, suggests a route how to get to any destination?! You just described a basic search engine. LLM is kind of a search engine for language
- OvidNaso 2y agoBut so are you and I. That's how you wrote this reply.
- ClumsyPilot 2y agoPreposterous- cavemen had no language but they could reason, think and learn. A child learns how to eat solid food and how to walk. That a square peg fits into a square hole. This has nothing to do with language. people who deaf and mute and cannot read can still reason and solve problems.