3 ms·
> much of what it does do could easily be replaced with a generative AI model that produces new space pictures for desktop backgrounds. Ok, you're obviously tr
by mikedelago 2y ago
> much of what it does do could easily be replaced with a generative AI model that produces new space pictures for desktop backgrounds.
Ok, you're obviously trolling here. This is clearly bait. But for anyone else reading this:
NASA's budget for 2023 was roughly $25 billion [0]
For the same year, NASA generated (again, roughly) $76 billion in economic output [1].
Every dollar of funding goes back into the economy three-fold. Doesn't really seem like a waste to me.
Also, NASA's operations in 2023 created/supported over 300,000 jobs to Americans[2]. Again, doesn't seem like a waste to me.
[0] - https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/fiscal-year-2024-nasa-budget-summary.pdf?emrc=67b604a9c843b https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/fiscal-year-...
[1] - https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/final-fy23-nasa-ecomomic-impact-report.pdf?emrc=67b5d1daee293 https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/final-fy23-n...
[2] - https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/nasa-fy23-economic-impact-report-brochure.pdf?emrc=67b5d1daedf76?emrc=dda96b https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/nasa-fy23-ec...
- palmotea 2y ago> Ok, you're obviously trolling here. This is clearly bait. But for anyone else reading this: Only a little. The point is "waste" and "efficiency" are so subjective to be a near meaningless concepts. You could make the same points you did about many of the things Musk wants to cut, but they're not going to resonate to a tech audience like cutting NASA does. It's basically a temple of geek religion. > NASA's budget for 2023 was roughly $25 billion [0] That money could fund a lot of housing assistance or healthcare. Personally, I think the things that "engineers" like should be cut first instead of being protected.