3 ms·
Isn't this the first time they have an actual zoom lens vs multiple lenses and thus CMOS? Edit: reading below it's still unsure if they actually have a lens th
by OptionOfT 2y ago
Isn't this the first time they have an actual zoom lens vs multiple lenses and thus CMOS?
Edit: reading below it's still unsure if they actually have a lens that moves back & forth to achieve the zoom.
- bayindirh 2y agoThis is the first time they use linear (classic zoom) design. The previous one was a 90-degree periscope design. From 16 Pro Max specifications: > 12MP 5x Telephoto: 120 mm, ƒ/2.8 aperture and 20° field of view, 100% Focus Pixels, seven-element lens, 3D sensor-shift optical image stabilization and autofocus, tetraprism design. 5x optical zoom in, 2x optical zoom out; 10x optical zoom range An image showing what they did earlier: https://i.4pda.ws/s/as6yz0d0FvbZniF2YYSyZ3z2HOWajz2.jpg https://i.4pda.ws/s/as6yz0d0FvbZniF2YYSyZ3z2HOWajz2.jpg
- stirlo 2y agoThere's absolutely no reason for them to introduce a new mechanical camera system. They previously marketed their cropping of the center 12MP of their 48MP sensor as 2x optical zoom. They will use the same method here.
- kemayo 2y agoStrongest argument that they didn't is that adding something like that is absolutely a thing Apple would have talked about at length in the press release. They love getting to do extensive "here's something cool that 'only Apple could do'" segments. (And we love to make fun of them for it.)
- kemayo 2y agoIt's probably the same as the 2x zoom in the iPhone 16 line. The 1x pictures are a 48MP sensor that does some pixel-combining to output a 12MP image. The 2x pictures are a crop of 12MP in the center of the sensor, that doesn't do any combining. So it's still "optical", but it's lower-quality than the 1x.
- bayindirh 2y agoI think it's not "zooming with the sensor", but has a slim lens stack to enable optical 2x zoom. The whole system is also PDAF, so they need the movement anyway.
- kemayo 2y agoIt'd be nifty if they did that, but I'm skeptical they'd introduce something like that on their new budget model.
- rescbr 2y agoI'd say it's a nice platform to test on before bringing it to flagship models. Same thing with the new modem.
- seec 2y agoThey did the modem because it's actually cheaper for them. They already bought the Intel division and had engineers work on it for over 5 years, so it's already sunk costs at best. Since they came up with a working design, it is FOR SURE cheaper for them to use it than to buy something from Qualcomm. I'm a bit suspicious about this, because if it was truly great, they would have waited longer to advertise it as a must have feature for their "pro" devices. It's sort of beta testing the thing on the lower volume product with less tech literate people who won't complain too much because of some weird connectivity issues. If it performs, Apple is going to make even more money on the next round of iPhone, not that Apple needs any more money but you know, if that could stop them from increasing the price, that could be nice.
- rescbr 2y agoI wouldn’t say it’s suspicious. I think it is a good plan to get telemetry from real world usage. Since Apple owns the whole stack, they can iterate faster too.
- enragedcacti 2y ago