3 ms·
No, because the $8M was allocated by a coequal branch of government. The president gets to veto things at that stage, not afterward. Should the president have
by drawkward 2y ago
No, because the $8M was allocated by a coequal branch of government. The president gets to veto things at that stage, not afterward.
Should the president have an ex post facto veto for everything? That sounds more like an autocracy to me.