3 ms·
The advantages of Pulsar are very much practical, at least for us. Without it we would have to manage two separate messaging systems. I don't see any evidence
by gnfargbl 2y ago
The advantages of Pulsar are very much practical, at least for us. Without it we would have to manage two separate messaging systems.
I don't see any evidence of StreamNative abandoning Pulsar at this point. I do see a compatibility layer for the Kafka protocol. That's fine.
- akshayshah 2y agoIt sure looks like they’re going quite a ways beyond Kafka-on-Pulsar - the Ursa/Oxia work they’re focused on right now replaces BookKeeper and seems very firmly Kafka-oriented. Or does Ursa also work with the Pulsar protocol?
- matteomerli 2y agoUrsa supports Pulsar protocol as well