4 ms·

You got to explain yourself _considerably_, is that a fair ask? To people replying to the guy with snaky comments - you THINK you know because somebody ( media

• lupusreal 2y ago
  This guy is a notorious troll/schizo who has been at it for years. He's had ample time to back up his claims with some evidence but never has. Of course you are welcome to give him the benifit of doubt and try to engage with him in good faith. I sincerely doubt it will lead anywhere, many have tried before you with no productive results.
  • Anotheroneagain 2y ago
    To be honest, I never figured out what the evidence could even look like. Normally, you would try to falsify the existing theory, but, that is not an option, since it never existed - the proponents came with the claim that it had always been known and insisted relentlessly. It has subtle, nondescript symptoms, the only clear sign of the poisoning is its presence in the blood. There are some other measurable chamges, but that would only get stuck on me claiming that it proves its essentiality, vs you claiming that it proves the poisoning. All the evidence like the presence in bones, 250kyo neanderthal teeth, phosphates, coal and so on has supposedly been somehow proven irrelevant. The lack of improved health and intellect, rather the increasingly undeniable presence of the inverse is being ignored. It's essentially unfalsifiable.
    • buttercraft 2y ago
      > To be honest, I never figured out what the evidence could even look like. Right on cue.