8 ms·
Just an anecdote, but 10 years following about 200-300 laptops, with about 90% of them using SSDs, I only had 2 drive failures, both with SSDs: one of them beca
by edwcross 2y ago
Just an anecdote, but 10 years following about 200-300 laptops, with about 90% of them using SSDs, I only had 2 drive failures, both with SSDs: one of them became completely unusable (all data lost and impossible to recover anything, even after paying a specialized company to retrieve the data), and the other cost 2k$ to get the data back - and the company struggled with it for a few weeks, after which the data became less useful.
Apparently the company was better equipped to handle HDDs, and would have probably gotten the data easily if that were the case. But the experience made me very dubious of SSD reliability.
In both cases, users were using their laptops just fine, and out of the blue, the laptops froze or had some erratic behavior, and the next time they booted, the drives were already unusable.
On the other hand, when I had an HDD failure (due to electrical power fluctuation), except for some bad sectors where the needle hit the disk, it remained usable for years.
So I agree with you, their failure modes are important. Of course, nowadays most laptops only have M.2 slots anyway, so HDDs are completely out of the question.
- nine_k 2y ago> cost 2k$ to get the data back Something about regular backups of valuable data should be said here.
- BenjiWiebe 2y agoHindsight is 20/20. They're probably doing better with backups now, and they certainly understood how beneficial backups are, when they were dealing with the data loss.