5 ms·

Sounds like nano texture from Apple. Much less reflective than standard glass, but with added graininess, which is clearly visible to me :(

by jim180 2y ago

bookofjoe 2y ago
Thank you for saving me a nice chunk of change by closing out my eternal debate about whether or not to pony up for a nano texture screen.
- throw-qqqqq 2y ago
  This topic is very subjective IMO. Some love the glossy screens, others the matte ones. And this is really what it comes down to for me. I would try getting a chance to view the difference in person before deciding.
  - AlanYx 2y ago
    Yes, I find that there are differences in eye strain between the regular and nanotexture displays, even in a dark room with no reflections. It's worth trying both. One interesting difference between the two that not a lot of people realize is that the light emitted by the regular screen is circularly polarized, while the nanotexture is largely non-polarized.
    - zachh 2y ago
      Can you explain more about what that means / share a link to further reading? Tried searching but couldn't find much online about the light polarization specifically, and am interested in the nanotexture for reducing eye strain.
      - AlanYx 2y ago
        There's some evidence that CPL emissive screens cause less eyestrain than linearly polarized emissive screens (e.g., https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9010255 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9010255), although the evidence there is not wildly strong. If you have a pair of RealD 3-D glasses (CPL filters) and look at a nanotexture iPad, you'll see that the nanotex layer decoheres the polarization of the underlying display, which is more like how normal (reflective) paper behaves.
        zachh 2y ago
        Very helpful, thank you!
  - jim180 2y ago
    Sure. I just wish I could buy both, test for a month or so and then keep the one I like more. Visiting Apple Store every other day, when I was visiting the US did not help much. So I stayed with standard glass.
    - bookofjoe 2y ago
      Indeed: only trying them both side by side at home would yield a useful conclusion. Trying to gauge which would be better for you from the Apple Store display would be about as useless as trying to decide which big TV to buy from Best Buy based on how they all look in the store, with settings completely other than those you'd use at home.
AlanYx 2y ago
The grain on the DC-1 is quite a bit more noticeable than the grain on Apple's nanotexture displays. I don't find the latter distracting, but I found that I couldn't really read PDFs with small text on the DC-1 because of the grain. (Some of that is probably resolution-related too, to be fair.)

Sounds like nano texture from Apple. Much less reflective than standard glass, but with added graininess, which is clearly visible to me :(

by jim180 2y ago

Sounds like nano texture from Apple. Much less reflective than standard glass, but with added graininess, which is clearly visible to me :(

bookofjoe 2y ago

Thank you for saving me a nice chunk of change by closing out my eternal debate about whether or not to pony up for a nano texture screen.

throw-qqqqq 2y ago
This topic is very subjective IMO. Some love the glossy screens, others the matte ones. And this is really what it comes down to for me. I would try getting a chance to view the difference in person before deciding.
- AlanYx 2y ago
  Yes, I find that there are differences in eye strain between the regular and nanotexture displays, even in a dark room with no reflections. It's worth trying both. One interesting difference between the two that not a lot of people realize is that the light emitted by the regular screen is circularly polarized, while the nanotexture is largely non-polarized.
  - zachh 2y ago
    Can you explain more about what that means / share a link to further reading? Tried searching but couldn't find much online about the light polarization specifically, and am interested in the nanotexture for reducing eye strain.
    - AlanYx 2y ago
      There's some evidence that CPL emissive screens cause less eyestrain than linearly polarized emissive screens (e.g., https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9010255 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9010255), although the evidence there is not wildly strong. If you have a pair of RealD 3-D glasses (CPL filters) and look at a nanotexture iPad, you'll see that the nanotex layer decoheres the polarization of the underlying display, which is more like how normal (reflective) paper behaves.
      - zachh 2y ago
        Very helpful, thank you!
- jim180 2y ago
  Sure. I just wish I could buy both, test for a month or so and then keep the one I like more. Visiting Apple Store every other day, when I was visiting the US did not help much. So I stayed with standard glass.
  - bookofjoe 2y ago
    Indeed: only trying them both side by side at home would yield a useful conclusion. Trying to gauge which would be better for you from the Apple Store display would be about as useless as trying to decide which big TV to buy from Best Buy based on how they all look in the store, with settings completely other than those you'd use at home.

AlanYx 2y ago

The grain on the DC-1 is quite a bit more noticeable than the grain on Apple's nanotexture displays. I don't find the latter distracting, but I found that I couldn't really read PDFs with small text on the DC-1 because of the grain. (Some of that is probably resolution-related too, to be fair.)