4 ms·
The 88x31 GIF Collection
- Tepix 2y agoNeat. However, with today's 4K screens, 88x31 is really tiny...
- avian 2y agoI was wondering where the odd 88x31 size came from. According to this [1] it's basically because at one point GeoCities used a GIF of this size and then everyone copied it. [1] https://ux.stackexchange.com/questions/140100/why-has-8831-become-the-standard-ratio-for-micro-bars https://ux.stackexchange.com/questions/140100/why-has-8831-b...
- jagermo 2y agointeresting, so basically a standard by simply everyone using it, like the #. Cool.
- rchaud 2y agoKeeping them at a uniform size probably helped them stack evenly when displayed in an HTML table. Back in the day, these GIFs served as site badges or favicons, which weren't created until 1999.
- card_zero 2y agoSeeing all these load immediately, and none of them stall, and then they all animate simultaneously and the browser doesn't crash ... feels really weird.
- ramon156 2y agoFunny, on the in-app browser of Harmonic it still goes on-by-one. Firefox on mobile also instantly loads. More nostalgia I suppose!
- jFriedensreich 2y agoThe joke is on me because i still see them load in slowly about 10 at a time.
- Cthulhu_ 2y agoIt's still HTTP 1.1, it's got 5 or so requests at a time but many short iterative download bursts. Since the server seems to use nginx and already uses https, upgrading to HTTP 2 or 3 shouldn't be a big issue.
- drbig 2y agoThe visual cacophony! The silent scream! A truly marvelous collection.
- patates 2y agoThere are some which may be NSFW. Just FYI. I'll wait until I switch to my private computer to dive into it more :)
- jFriedensreich 2y agoOne phrase caught my attention saying "No frames now!" in a few variations. Were frames a disputed feature at one time?
- rendx 2y agoAren't they still, or rather, almost completely dead and gone?
- theshrike79 2y agoFrames were used because server side rendering of partial pages was sometimes a massive pain. There was no fancy React DOM that could refresh just the relevant bits. In these cases you just added a frame and you could click through content and the navigation would stay in place. ...but then, like always, people went overboard and pages started to have 42 frames within frames within frames and it made everything painful.
- 2mlWQbCK 2y agoEven when reasonably sensibly used the result was a page where you could not bookmark sub-pages (important at the time, when everyone was still using bookmarks!). This forum thread from 25 years ago that came up near the top when I searched for frame hate was a fun window into a different time with many expressing just why and how much they hated frames: https://arstechnica.com/civis/threads/why-do-people-hate-html-frames.1045201/ https://arstechnica.com/civis/threads/why-do-people-hate-htm... Happily surprised to see that the page linked towards the end of the thread, last modified in 1997, is still online: https://www.htmlhelp.org/design/frames/whatswrong.html https://www.htmlhelp.org/design/frames/whatswrong.html
- p0w3n3d 2y agoLooks like www.milliondollarhomepage.com
- yapyap 2y agoah man, them loading in was satisfying!
- Philpax 2y agoIf you enjoy this, you may also enjoy https://eightyeightthirty.one/ https://eightyeightthirty.one/, which is a network graph of every website with 88x31 links, updated weekly.
- BugsJustFindMe 2y agoPage crashes repeatedly for me in iOS Safari
- lotrjohn 2y agoUsername checks out…
- myfonj 2y agoFor crisp and quadrupled device pixels there, F12 console and: with( document.documentElement.style ){ transformOrigin = '0 0'; imageRendering = 'pixelated'; scale = 1 / devicePixelRatio * 4; }
- jwilk 2y agoPreviously: 2023: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34465455 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34465455 (45 comments) 2021: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27500624 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27500624 (124 comments)
- matsemann 2y agoIn the same vein, under construction geocities archive: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=879255 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=879255 / http://www.textfiles.com/underconstruction/ http://www.textfiles.com/underconstruction/
- jihadjihad 2y agoSeeing all the Macromedia ones (“Made with Macromedia Dreamweaver”) right next to the Adobe ones is probably intentional, but still a little jarring even all these years later. I cut my teeth building sites with Dreamweaver back in the day and still am sore about Adobe letting it wither on the vine after the acquisition.
- dialup_sounds 2y agoYou may also enjoy 80x15 badges: https://web.badges.world/ https://web.badges.world/
- acheron 2y agoWhat were the ones that were narrower that usually said things like “Apache” or “XHTML” or something technical? Ah here, 80x15 badges: https://web.badges.world https://web.badges.world I think those were popular a bit later than the 88x31 ones.
- biofox 2y agoWhat happened to these? They were on every website, then without me even noticing, they just disappeared.
- markstos 2y agoThe have a spiritual successor that you still see on software project pages: https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/blob/main/README.md https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/blob/main/README.md
- talles 2y agoI've picked my favorite: https://cyber.dabamos.de/88x31/nowebp.gif https://cyber.dabamos.de/88x31/nowebp.gif
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]