It would probably be fair or "normal" if for every pro-article, regardles of the subject, there would be room for the contrary opinion, for the downsides. That

It would probably be fair or "normal" if for every pro-article, regardles of the subject, there would be room for the contrary opinion, for the downsides. That would inject some dose of realism into the discussion. Otherwise the journalism, in general, is not in such a great shape if it can only regurgitate the same thing over and over, the same words from the same mouths. Just an idea. I donno.