I believe GP is being sarcastic, as this seems to be a common reaction. Every time a machine accomplishes something that seems to be intelligent, we redefine in

I believe GP is being sarcastic, as this seems to be a common reaction. Every time a machine accomplishes something that seems to be intelligent, we redefine intelligence to exclude that thing, and now the issue is fixed: computers are not intelligent and they cannot think. Never mind that they can beat the entire world at chess and Go, and 90+% of the population at math, engineering, and physics problems. Those things do not require intelligence or thinking.