3 ms·
In basically every case, by the time a claim like that is stated in a paper like that, it's obsolete by the time it's published, and ancient history by the time
by CamperBob2 2y ago
In basically every case, by the time a claim like that is stated in a paper like that, it's obsolete by the time it's published, and ancient history by the time you use it to try to win an argument.
- zipy124 2y agoMy point is merely if you are going to make an argument using a source, the source should support your argument. If you say "the accuracy of an llm on task 1 is 90% [1]" and when you go to [1] it says the accuracy of an llm on task 1 is 50%, but some sources say with better prompts you can get to 90%, but when extended to a larger data-set for task 1, performance drops to 70%" then just quoting the highest number is mis-leading.