4 ms·
> So you are saying OSes can only be compared objectively on specific features, and not in an overall capacity? Depends. “Better” is a subjective term so if yo
by hnlmorg 2y ago
> So you are saying OSes can only be compared objectively on specific features, and not in an overall capacity?
Depends. “Better” is a subjective term so if you were to discuss overall capacity objectively then you would need to explain why you arrived at that conclusion. Otherwise it’s left to interpretation (ie subjective).
For example: I could make several well reasoned arguments why I consider Windows 2000 to be better. Others could do the same for XP. We are all correct for our own interpretation of “best”.
- kennysoona 2y ago> “Better” is a subjective term so if you were to discuss overall capacity objectively then you would need to explain why you arrived at that conclusion. Well, like I said, I need not describe the methodology that would result in objective measurement - it need only be possible to measure things objectively to the best of our ability. And it is.