5 ms·
1 month is really too early to say if it is failing or not.
by up2isomorphism 2y ago
1 month is really too early to say if it is failing or not.
- toomuchtodo 2y agoHow long will be enough to fairly evaluate success?
- alsoforgotmypwd 2y agoYou know they'll say "we need to wait 4 years to fully appreciate the impact."
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- rasz 2y agoFull 15 year presidential term.
- talldayo 2y agoWe should really reserve our judgements until we account the tax cuts and military aid they have planned, too.
- alsoforgotmypwd 2y ago[flagged]
- NomDePlum 2y agoIs it clear what is being attempted? If not how will we know whether it is failing or not?
- tailefer 2y agoIf one month is too early to indicate failure, it's also too early to claim success. But that's not stopping doge and musk from touting how much the cuts and chaos have "saved". If I sell my car on Friday, I might claim to have saved a $500 a month car payment. But what happens on Monday when I need to get to work? The responsible course of action would have been to lay out the markers of success so their actions could be assessed against objective measures. That's not what we're seeing in practice.
- up2isomorphism 2y agoIn fact someone wants to even downvote this shows how fucked up we are now.