3 ms·
No problem. Just redefine "thinking".
by recursive 2y ago
No problem. Just redefine "thinking".
- James_K 2y agoTo what? And how does that change the reality of what the models are doing?
- svachalek 2y agoI believe GP is being sarcastic, as this seems to be a common reaction. Every time a machine accomplishes something that seems to be intelligent, we redefine intelligence to exclude that thing, and now the issue is fixed: computers are not intelligent and they cannot think. Never mind that they can beat the entire world at chess and Go, and 90+% of the population at math, engineering, and physics problems. Those things do not require intelligence or thinking.