> it would seem you no longer agree with that either. On the other hand, you pretended that fixing that apache configuration was somehow "all I needed to do" t

> it would seem you no longer agree with that either. On the other hand, you pretended that fixing that apache configuration was somehow "all I needed to do" to be compliant with EU regulations. We proved that this was wrong, and despite your best effort you are still unable to give a proper list of everything I need to do. You are unable to do so because it is virtually impossible; no matter how thorough you believe you are, you might still be missing an element you don't know well enough. To be safe the only path is to accept the fact that you will need to access personal data, even if that's not your purpose, nor if you do anything with them. The additional paperwork and needless effort are mandatory. This in turn explains that regardless of what the Grok3 team really does behind the scenes; they DO have additional work to complete to be able to release their product in Europe, and that might explain the delay. > If you willy-willy use bug tracking software that is needlessly collect and/or process EU individuals personal data, then yeah, you need to follow the regulations in the region you operate in. I am willing to use whatever error tracking software you suggest. My criteria are simple: I might have JS errors I don't know about, please give me enough information to fix the underlying issue when that happens, without requiring me to fill additional paperwork. My whole point is that the definition of what constitutes "personal data" is so wide that such a tool does not exist.