3 ms·

I mean there is no cost for others, though. You don't have a right to not be "exposed". If you think the way we handle laws around photography or whatever shoul

by wilg 2y ago

I mean there is no cost for others, though. You don't have a right to not be "exposed". If you think the way we handle laws around photography or whatever should be changed, we have a whole democracy for brokering that. (Or at least we did until very recently.)

JohnFen 2y ago
You're arguing legalities. That's orthogonal to my objection. Plenty of bad things are legal.
- wilg 2y ago
  You didn't really specify what's bad, and I don't think the current law on photography (or whatever you're worried about) is an issue so I'm arguing both ethics/morals and legalities.