3 ms·
It’s a start for sure, a TV that’s really out to track you might well be able to circumvent these blocks, but most TVs (and indeed most tracking technologies on
by xrisk 2y ago
It’s a start for sure, a TV that’s really out to track you might well be able to circumvent these blocks, but most TVs (and indeed most tracking technologies on the web) to my understanding are not so sophisticated. For the average person who wants to enjoy some of the smart features of their TV this is a good compromise.
And I’m not sure what you mean by the router being the better place to add guardrails. What sort of guardrails can you possibly add outside of blocking internet access outright to the TV? It would be near impossible to distinguish between legitimate traffic and ad/tracking traffic without resorting to something like SNI sniffing which again can be bypassed.
- nothrabannosir 2y agoSmart TV opt-out telemetry is malicious.
- xrisk 2y agoEdited to clarify what I mean.
- nothrabannosir 2y agoThanks for giving my glib comment the credibility it didn't deserve. Less flippantly, I'm worried it will be sooner rather than later that someone figures out how to route the telemetry and ads over the same TLS endpoint as the bona fide services. At that point it's game over, and I don't think it needs much "sophistication". Just a different path on the same HTTPS endpoint...