Of course, but to start the uphill battle of calling out the bullshit, we have to at least know which bullshit to counter. For me, the only charitable interpre

Of course, but to start the uphill battle of calling out the bullshit, we have to at least know which bullshit to counter. For me, the only charitable interpretation of DOGE is that they have accidentally figured out how to spread incompetence (not wholly unfamiliar to much of the government) to the small islands that fended it off (gutting 18F/USDS). The cherry was accidentally firing a chunk of the nation's nuclear experts to save a dime, and then clawing them back. I think any claim of DOGE doing good work has to address those things in a convincing manner (in addition to why the existing processes are lacking; GAO). I haven't seen that attempted by anyone.