Yes, but it's OK for the top 0.1% to shoulder a greater than 0.1% of the burden. Why? Because that enormously expensive army we're maintaining is protecting m

Yes, but it's OK for the top 0.1% to shoulder a greater than 0.1% of the burden. Why? Because that enormously expensive army we're maintaining is protecting mostly their stuff. Setting aside the fact that, say, poor people, have no money; why should the poor pay an equivalent share to protect the wealthy person's property?