3 ms·
I think this is a case where someone is trying to come up with technical solutions for a perception problem. Jumping back to the Harry's Chips example, why do c
by hluska 14y ago
I think this is a case where someone is trying to come up with technical solutions for a perception problem. Jumping back to the Harry's Chips example, why do consumers have such negative views of URLs like this:
harrys-chips-of-york.com
harrys.yorkbusinesses.com
harrys.chipshops.com
harryschips.info
DNS (as it stands) is a perfect system, but {short name/no dashes or numbers}.com is unsustainable. As soon as people start looking at subdomains/atypical tlds as being just as valuable, the problem will right itself.
- MatthewPhillips 14y agoShort name no dashes dot com is not unsustainable; it's completely over with for those without funding. There's nothing wrong with .info and the like (I use a .info for my personal domain) except perception. My hope is that the new GTLD rules will make the domain extension less important, and if so it will make squatting values go down.